We didn't know we were poor

Low income housing in Columbus, MississippiMississippi is my home state. When Mississippians admit their roots, they often hear stereotypical responses that drip with mockery, innuendo and misunderstanding. So we develop certain coping mechanisms, like the self-effacing joke I’ve used for years: “Yeah, I didn’t start wearing shoes until I got married!” It provides comic relief, gives my friends something to laugh about, and allows the awkward moment to pass. Maybe that’s why our state bird is called the “Mockingbird” (just kidding).

When most people think about Mississippi, three subjects usually come to mind: poverty, ignorance, and racism. When I looked up the most recent (2006) statistical rankings for “Percent of People 25 Years and Over Who Have Completed High School,” my birthplace ranks 77.9%—dead last among the fifty states. It also ranks last for median housing value, median family income, percent of people below poverty level, and percent of people 25 years and over who have completed an advanced degree. The Magnolia State also leads the others with the highest percentage (37.4%) of people who would identify themselves as black or African American alone (versus being another race or mixture of more than one race); and everyone knows we have been a hotbed of racism since the state’s formation in 1817. When tensions erupted over slavery, Mississippi was the second state to secede from the Union, probably due to its reliance on the cotton industry and the nearly 437,000 slaves (55% of the state’s population in 1860) that worked the land for the wealthy kings of cotton.

Both of my parents grew up in poverty: my mother was raised on a dairy farm and my father lived in a two-bedroom shack as the youngest of four children in a nearby town. His father was an abusive alcoholic for many years, barely keeping food on the table, until he became a Christian. After his conversion, my grandfather became a respected barber in the town until his retirement. I can remember the first time it dawned on me that my paternal grandparents fell into the category of “white trash”—a horrible description that robs people of their humanity—but I still loved them and cherish the memories of my visits to their ramshackled house on the “other side of the tracks.” The houses in the above photograph are just a few blocks from that little shack, now torn down and replaced with a newer home.

My parents struggled to break out of poverty: my dad worked his way up from reading gas meters to managing a small gas utility company in northwest Mississippi and my mom was an amazing entrepreneur with a keen sense for business opportunities. She owned and operated half a dozen different businesses—a cafe, a women’s dress shop, self-employed seamstress, and a care home for the elderly—in addition to working for banks, insurance companies, and department stores. We would have been considered on the lower fringe of middle-class by the time I reached my teens. If I learned anything from watching my parents raise a family, it was the lesson that hard work and determination can overcome many financial and other sorts of hardships. “No one’s gonna hand you anything on a silver platter!” It was one of those things I remember hearing around our dining table, as well as things like, “You’ll get out of it exactly what you put into it.” Clichés to some, perhaps, but they were lifelines and anchors for me.

I wouldn’t trade the memories of growing up poor for the opportunity to live in a palace from birth. It’s part of who I am and it gives me a sense of identity with the poor, although one might argue that we really do not understand real poverty in the western world. But I disagree with that notion. On my last trip to the states, I was introduced to a really great book, A Framework for Understanding Poverty by Ruby K. Payne, PhD, the leading U. S. expert on the mindsets of poverty, middle class, and wealth. She gives twelve key points in the introduction:

  1. Poverty is relative.
  2. Poverty occurs in all races and in all countries.
  3. Economic class is a continuous line, not a clear-cut distinction.
  4. Generational poverty and situational poverty are different.
  5. This work is based on patterns. All patterns have exceptions.
  6. An individual brings with him/her the hidden rules of the class in which he/she was raised.
  7. Schools and businesses operate from middle-class norms and use the hidden rules of middle class.
  8. For our students to be successful, we must understand their hidden rules and teach them the rules that will make them successful at school and work.
  9. We can neither excuse students nor scold them for not knowing; as educators we must teach them and provide support, insistence, and expectations.
  10. To move from poverty to middle class or middle class to wealth, an individual must give up relationships for achievement (at least for some period of time).
  11. Two things that help one move out of poverty are education and relationships.
  12. Four reasons one leaves poverty are: It’s too painful to stay, a vision or goal, a key relationship, or a special talent or skill.

When the above author speaks of poverty as being “relative,” she goes on the explain that “If everyone around you has similar circumstances, the notion of poverty and wealth is vague. Poverty or wealth only exists in relationship to known quantities or expectations.” [p. 2] That really makes a lot of sense to me; and it also explains the meaning behind the words, “We didn’t know we were poor!” Have you ever heard an old-timer make such a remark as they tell the story of their life? I couldn’t count the times!

So what is poverty? I worked for a very wealthy family at one point in my business career. They had it all, it seemed to me: he drove a shiny new Jaguar, she owned a new sports convertible, they lived in a house ten times the size of mine (with only one child), and their horse barn was bigger and nicer than my house. One day I was showing my work colleagues a photograph of my house—rather proud of a fresh coat of paint I had applied one weekend—and my rich employer’s wife remarked, “That’s a cute little bungalow.” I was crushed! She might as well have referred to my home as a shack, as I remembered the embarrassing little structure where my grandparents lived and died. We felt really blessed to live in a four-bedroom, two bath home on a nice boulevard in a middle-class neighborhood, but it was just a “bungalow” compared to her mansion. But relatively speaking, she was wealthy and I was poor.

Dr. Payne defines poverty as “the extent to which an individual does without resources” [7] and then she defines resources as the following:

  • Financial: Having the money to purchase goods and services
  • Emotional: Being able to choose and control emotional responses, particularly to negative situations, without engaging in self-destructive behavior.
  • Mental: Having the mental abilities and acquired skills (reading, writing, computing) to deal with daily life.
  • Spiritual: Believing in divine purpose and guidance.
  • Physical: Having physical health and mobility.
  • Support Systems: Having friends, family, and backup resources available to access in times of need.
  • Relationships/Role Models: Having frequent access to adult(s) who are appropriate, who are nurturing to the child, and who do not engage in self-destructive behavior.
  • Knowledge of Hidden Rules: Knowing the unspoken cues and habits of a group.

This is a very helpful framework when it comes to thinking about poverty, because we often think of poverty only in terms of doing without financial resources. But poverty is much more than that, isn’t it? It seems to me that you could have an abundance of the last seven resources and very little money, but you would be much less impoverished than someone who just had a lot of money in the bank without any of the latter resources.

I would be very interested in hearing from you. Do you have any experience in poverty: personally or through working with those in poverty? Could you join this conversation about what it means to be poor and whether we can “make poverty history”?

This entry was posted in Culture, Featured, Personal and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to We didn't know we were poor

  1. Pistol Pete says:

    Very thoughtful reflection on a timely topic. I’m one generation removed from poverty (my father’s family were, in essence, share croppers). I have no brilliant ideas to eradicate poverty. My only thought is that we need to address poverty in all its aspects – physical, emotional, spiritual, etc…, if we are to gain any ground.

  2. Sean Gossett says:

    Bill,

    I just stumbled onto your blog this morning and found your writing to be very enjoyable. I don’t have much to add to what you’ve said, and I certainly don’t want to over-simplify a very complex issue, but I tend to think poverty is primarily a spiritual problem.

    Proverbs 10:4 says, “Lazy hands make a man poor, but diligent hands bring wealth.”

    Now, that’s not a promise, but a principle. Obviously, sometimes people are indeed diligent in their work and they still don’t prosper, financially. But there are also many cases of generational poverty that stems from a grandfather (or earlier) that lacked character to provide for his family – be it spiritually, financially, emotionally or whatever. Still, though, it is a spiritual issue.

    I believe that in surrendering one’s life to the lordship of Christ and feeding upon the Word of God consistently, almighty God will bestow increased wisdom to deal honorably (biblically) with issues that arise.

    • Bill Lollar says:

      Sean,

      I appreciate your viewpoint, but I think Christians can run the risk of sounding shallow and empty when we submit a spiritual answer for every social issue. Do people need Jesus? Of course! Does knowing Jesus eliminate laziness and other forms of character weakness? Not necessarily.

      My own denomination—the Southern Baptist Convention—is overwhelmingly white, middle class, and quite well-to-do by anyone’s standards; and yet laziness, greed, pride, lack of compassion, and materialism run rampant in nearly every local church. If Jesus is the answer we claim, then it really shouldn’t be the way it is, should it? Now I’m not saying that most people don’t need to know Him and live in relationship with the triune God, but I’m just pointing out that poverty will not be eradicated by spirituality any more than the other “sins” I’ve listed above.

      I would agree that hard work goes a long way, provided there are jobs available for those willing to engage themselves in the workforce, but these days of global recession are taking their toll on those who are willing to work but who cannot find gainful employment. Imagine the self-employed farmer who works under the hot sun far more hours than the investment banker. He gains a crop but finds that the market price has dropped way below what it cost him to produce.

      Personally, I don’t believe poverty will ever be eradicated when you consider Payne’s first premise: poverty is relative. It’s really not always about money. There are many financially prosperous people in the world who are impoverished in nearly every other category: emotional, mental, spiritual, physical, and relational.

      But one encouraging aspect for Christians is this: we can make a huge difference in the lives of others, especially when it comes to building relationships and support systems with those who find themselves without anyone willing to give them a hand up and out of the cycle of poverty they have always known.

      • Sean Gossett says:

        Bill,

        Thanks for your reply. I realized I ran the risk of sounding shallow and empty with the “Sunday School answer” of Jesus being all we need, but I will stick by my statement.

        I, too, am Southern Baptist and know the issues of which you speak. However, it seems to me that almost all SBC churches are operating in a church structure that is not biblical (single pastor head with “his” staff and board of directors (deacons). Go to any SBC website and you will see the pastor as CEO portrayed on it. It is the business model transferred over to the church.

        You wrote: “My own denomination—the Southern Baptist Convention—is overwhelmingly white, middle class, and quite well-to-do by anyone’s standards; and yet laziness, greed, pride, lack of compassion, and materialism run rampant in nearly every local church.”

        Not only do most churches in the twenty-first century not resemble the New Testament in structure (single head pastor), few SBC churches practice meaningful church discipline. It’s not a priority. Why? It’s too painful. Most are too busy “growing” the church and focusing on other things. The result is scores of “members” that aren’t born again, which robs the church of spiritual life and strength and witness in the community. Relationships in these churches are too shallow to support church discipline. I do believe that Jesus is the answer, but there are very complex reasons within the American church that cloud that for us.

        Healthy churches will have healthy leadership (plurality of coequal elders) and will produce healthy members (Titus 2 model) that will grow in Christlikeness. Growing in Christlikeness touches every part of one’s character – emotional, mental, spiritual, physical, and relational. I do think it can touch financial as well, but don’t want to run the risk of sounding like I support the “prosperity gospel”. What I mean, is that an individual with increasing wisdom will manage his affairs more responsibly. He will also desire to work hard so that he may share with those in need (Ephesians 4:28).

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s